ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998
Diabetes: a time for excitement-and concern. Hopeful signs exist that the ravages of diabetes can be tamed.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Participating in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS): a qualitative study of patients' experiences.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003Article
- Islet cell transplantation.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2002Article
- Thiazolidinediones for type 2 diabetes. New agents reduce insulin resistance but need long term clinical trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.