ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR1998
Growth kinetics of suspended microbial cells: from single-substrate-controlled growth to mixed-substrate kinetics.
Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
139 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermodynamic Evaluation of Dual Substrate Growth.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Article
- Fitness advantage of sequential metabolic strategies emerges from community interactions in strongly fluctuating environments.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Unspecific Peroxygenases-Catalyzed Oxidation of Pharmaceutical Compounds Considered Emerging Contaminants.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Article
- Mono- and Polyauxic Growth Kinetics: A Semi-Mechanistic Framework for Complex Biological Dynamics.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Article
- A nutrient bottleneck controls antibiotic efficacy in structured bacterial populations.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Heterogeneous multicopy of blaNature communications · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of enzymatic defence mechanisms in Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn. and Acacia concinna (Willd.) DC. using a Michaelis-Menten kinetic model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Kinetic study of glyphosate biodegradation by actinobacterial consortium RH1: implications for bioremediation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Decomposition causes short-term increases in functional molecular diversity of dissolved organic matter.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Global constraint principle for microbial growth laws.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Age-Dependent Pleomorphism inMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- PlomBOX: a low cost bioassay for the sensitive detection of lead in drinking water.Communications engineering · 2025Article
- Nutrient colimitation is a quantitative, dynamic property of microbial populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- At what cost? The impact of bacteriophage resistance on the growth kinetics and protein synthesis of Escherichia coli.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Article
- Sensitivities in protein allocation models reveal distribution of metabolic capacity and flux control.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Metabolic interactions shape emergent biofilm structures in a conceptual model of gut mucosal bacterial communities.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Article
- Computer simulation study of nutrient-driven bacterial biofilm stratification.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Development of a hybrid bio-purification process of lactic acid solutions employing an engineered E. coli strain in a membrane bioreactor.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2024Article
- An Automatic Method for Generation of CFD-Based 3D Compartment Models: Towards Real-Time Mixing Simulations.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Estimating the contribution of the porcine fecal core microbiota to metabolite production via mathematical modeling andmSystems · 2024Article
79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growth kinetics, i.e., the relationship between specific growth rate and the concentration of a substrate, is one of the basic tools in microbiology. However, despite more than half a century of research, many fundamental questions about the validity and application of growth kinetics as observed in the laboratory to environmental growth conditions are still unanswered. For pure cultures growing with single substrates, enormous inconsistencies exist in the growth kinetic data reported. The low quality of experimental data has so far hampered the comparison and validation of the different growth models proposed, and only recently have data collected from nutrient-controlled chemostat cultures allowed us to compare different kinetic models on a statistical basis. The problems are mainly due to (i) the analytical difficulty in measuring substrates at growth-controlling concentrations and (ii) the fact that during a kinetic experiment, particularly in batch systems, microorganisms alter their kinetic properties because of adaptation to the changing environment. For example, for Escherichia coli growing with glucose, a physiological long-term adaptation results in a change in KS for glucose from some 5 mg liter-1 to ca. 30 microg liter-1. The data suggest that a dilemma exists, namely, that either "intrinsic" KS (under substrate-controlled conditions in chemostat culture) or micromax (under substrate-excess conditions in batch culture) can be measured but both cannot be determined at the same time. The above-described conventional growth kinetics derived from single-substrate-controlled laboratory experiments have invariably been used for describing both growth and substrate utilization in ecosystems. However, in nature, microbial cells are exposed to a wide spectrum of potential substrates, many of which they utilize simultaneously (in particular carbon sources). The kinetic data available to date for growth of pure cultures in carbon-controlled continuous culture with defined mixtures of two or more carbon sources (including pollutants) clearly demonstrate that simultaneous utilization results in lowered residual steady-state concentrations of all substrates. This should result in a competitive advantage of a cell capable of mixed-substrate growth because it can grow much faster at low substrate concentrations than one would expect from single-substrate kinetics. Additionally, the relevance of the kinetic principles obtained from defined culture systems with single, mixed, or multicomponent substrates to the kinetics of pollutant degradation as it occurs in the presence of alternative carbon sources in complex environmental systems is discussed. The presented overview indicates that many of the environmentally relevant apects in growth kinetics are still waiting to be discovered, established, and exploited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.