Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9726921›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1998

Autocorrelation function and power spectrum of two-state random processes used in neurite guidance.

D J Odde, H M Buettner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Four-stranded mini microtubules formed byProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D J OddeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton 49931, USA. odde@mtu.edu
H M Buettner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During development neurons extend and retract cytoskeletal structures, chiefly microtubules and filopodia, to process informational cues from the extracellular environment and thereby guide growth cone migration toward an appropriate synaptic partner. This cytoskeleton-based exploration is achieved by stochastic switching, with microtubules and filopodia alternating between growing and shortening phases apparently at random. If stabilizing signals are not detected during the growth phase, then the structures switch to a shortening state, from which they can again return to a growth phase, and so forth. A useful means of characterizing these stochastic processes in a model-independent way is by autocorrelation and spectral analysis. Previously, we compared experiment to theory by performing Monte Carlo simulations and computing the autocorrelation function and power spectrum from the simulated dynamics, an approach that is computationally intensive and requires recalculation whenever model parameters are changed. Here we present analytical expressions for the autocorrelation function and power spectrum, which compactly characterize microtubule and filopodial dynamics based on the stochastic, two-state model. The model assumes that the phase times are of variable duration and gamma-distributed, consistent with experimental evidence for microtubules assembled in vitro from purified tubulin. The analytical expressions permit the precise quantitative characterization of changes in microtubule and filopodial searching behavior corresponding to changes in the shape of the gamma distribution.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsChick EmbryoGrowth ConesMicrotubulesNeuritesPseudopodiaStochastic ProcessesTubulinTubulin

Identifiers

PMID9726921
PMCPMC1299794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.