ArticleGenetics1998
Detection of the ongoing sorting of ancestrally polymorphic SINEs toward fixation or loss in populations of two species of charr during speciation.
Article in Genetics, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Retroposon analysis and recent geological data suggest near-simultaneous divergence of the three superorders of mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009Article
- Bead-probe complex capture a couple of SINE and LINE family from genomes of two closely related species of East Asian cyprinid directly using magnetic separation.BMC genomics · 2009Article
- Sauria SINEs: Novel short interspersed retroposable elements that are widespread in reptile genomes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2006Article
- Phylogenetic relationships among East African haplochromine fish as revealed by short interspersed elements (SINEs).Journal of molecular evolution · 2004Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The FokI family of short interspersed repetitive elements (SINEs) has been found only in the genomes of charr fishes (genus Salvelinus). In an analysis of the insertion of FokI SINEs using PCR, we characterized six loci at which FokI SINEs have been inserted into the genomes of Salvelinus alpinus (Arctic charr) and/or S. malma (Dolly Varden). An analysis of one locus (Fok-223) suggested that a sister relationship exists between S. alpinus and S. malma and the SINE at this locus might have been inserted in a common ancestor of these two species, being fixed in all extant populations examined. By contrast, SINEs at two other loci (Fok-211 and Fok-206) were present specifically in the genome of S. alpinus, with polymorphism among populations of this species. Moreover, the presence or absence of the SINEs of the other three loci (Fok-214, Fok-217, and Fok-600) varied among populations of these two species. The most plausible interpretation of this result is that SINEs, which were ancestrally polymorphic in the genome of a common ancestor of these two species, are involved in an ongoing process of differential sorting and subsequent fixation in the various populations of each species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.