ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics
Pharmacokinetic examination of antipyrine passage through the placenta and the small intestine in rats.
Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The placental and small intestinal barriers, though obviously different, show many functional as well as morphological similarities. When the surface area of both barriers in man was recalculated to a unit of body weight, nearly identical values (2.71 and 2.86 m2/kg of body mass, respectively) were obtained. The aims of the present study were (1) to compare mutual permeability of these two barriers to antipyrine (AP), and (2) to describe pharmacokinetics of AP in pregnant and non-pregnant rats. In placental studies AP showed that its rapid transfer through the placenta (k(tr) = 0.046 min(-1)) was governed by the mechanism of passive diffusion. In the closed circuit, FMCR(eq) was 1.085, t(eq) was 112.10 min and k(eq) was 0.020 min(-1). Absorptive studies performed on the rat small intestine indicated an identical mechanism of drug transport. The apparent first-order absorption rate constant of AP was 0.479 min(-1), and Tmax was 8.95 minutes. Differences in AP pharmacokinetics between pregnant and non-pregnant rats were significant during the distribution phase (t(1/2) = 3.78 and 5.87 min, respectively), whereas the elimination phase was unaffected. AP has been demonstrated, as expected, to be an excellent marker for drug transport studies through different body barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9725468What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.