Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9724330›Full record

ArticleGenome research1998

Sequencing of cDNA clones from the genetic map of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum).

M W Ganal, R Czihal, U Hannappel, D U Kloos, A Polley, H Q Ling

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genome mapping and molecular breeding of tomato.International journal of plant genomics · 2007
    Article
  5. Characterization and mapping of RPi-ber, a novel potato late blight resistance gene from Solanum berthaultii.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2006
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Inheritance and genetic mapping of tuber eye depth in cultivated diploid potatoes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2005
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M W GanalInstitute for Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany. ganal@ipk-gatersleben.de
R Czihal
U Hannappel
D U Kloos
A Polley
H Q Ling

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dense RFLP linkage map of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) contains >300 anonymous cDNA clones. Of those clones, 272 were partially or completely sequenced. The sequences were compared at the DNA and protein level to known genes in databases. For 57% of the clones, a significant match to previously described genes was found. The information will permit the conversion of those markers to STS markers and allow their use in PCR-based mapping experiments. Furthermore, it will facilitate the comparative mapping of genes across distantly related plant species by direct comparison of DNA sequences and map positions. [cDNA sequence data reported in this paper have been submitted to the EMBL database under accession nos. AA824695-AA825005 and the dbEST_Id database under accession nos. 1546519-1546862.]

Indexed as

Genes, PlantSequence Analysis, DNAArabidopsisChromosome MappingCloning, MolecularDatabases, FactualDNA, ComplementaryDNA, PlantGenetic MarkersMolecular Sequence DataPlant ProteinsPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthSequence Homology, Amino AcidSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidSequence Tagged SitesSolanum lycopersicumDNA, ComplementaryDNA, PlantGenetic MarkersPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID9724330
PMCPMC310761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.