ArticleJournal of clinical pathology1998
A novel technique for assessment of adherence of Candida albicans to solid surfaces.
Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differences of cytotoxicity of orthodontic bands assessed by survival tests in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.BioMed research international · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel approach for the assessment of adherence of Candida albicans to translucent acrylic material is described. The method uses the inverted microscope to visualise yeast adhering to acrylic surfaces while the test material remains immersed in buffer. Adherent cells were not subjected to surface tension forces that can occur during drying processes, so that an even distribution of yeast with no aggregation occurred. The process of counting attached yeast was subsequently performed without difficulty. From the 11 C albicans isolates examined, two groups were evident with respect to acrylic adherence: one group of four isolates with an adherence level of 400 yeast/mm2 acrylic, and one group of seven isolates with adherence levels of 1000 yeast/mm2 acrylic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.