Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9707562›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1998

Primary activation of interferon A and interferon B gene transcription by interferon regulatory factor 3.

Y T Juang, W Lowther, M Kellum, W C Au, R Lin, J Hiscott, P M Pitha

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 266 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. DNA-PKcs restrictsFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Control of Cytokines in Latent Cytomegalovirus Infection.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Y T JuangOncology Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
W Lowther
M Kellum
W C Au
R Lin
J Hiscott
P M Pitha
Johns Hopkins University · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

VIRUS/IFN INDUCED SIGNALING PATHWAY IN PATHOGENICITYR01AI019737 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PITHA-ROWE, PAULA M · 1985 to 2006
$1.6M
Role of Transcription Factor IRF-5 in Infected CellsR21AI019737 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PITHA-ROWE, PAULA M · 2001 to 2001
$286k
NIAID NIH HHS AI19737NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI019737NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI019737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The family of interferon (IFN) regulatory factors (IRFs) encodes DNA-binding transcription factors, some of which function as modulators of virus-induced signaling. The IRF-3 gene is constitutively expressed in many tissues and cell types, and neither virus infection nor IFN treatment enhances its transcription. In infected cells, however, IRF-3 protein is phosphorylated at the carboxyl terminus, which facilitates its binding to the CBP/p300 coactivator. In the present study, we demonstrate that overexpression of IRF-3 significantly enhances virus-mediated transcription of the IFNA and IFNB genes in infected cells as well as IFN synthesis. IRF-3-mediated activation of IFN genes depends in part on carboxyl-terminal phosphorylation of a cluster of Ser/Thr residues, because a mutant with Ser/Thr to Ala substitutions activates the IFN promoter less efficiently. However, overexpression of IRF-3 in human 2FTGH cells alone results in the induction of an antiviral state, which depends on functional IFN signaling, because IRF-3 does not induce an antiviral state in mutant 2FTGH cells defective in either JAK-1 or p48 functions; also no antiviral effect of IRF-3 could be demonstrated in Vero cells that lack the IFNA and IFNB genes. This finding indicates that the observed antiviral activity of IRF-3 in 2FTGH cells results mainly from the induction of IFNs. Furthermore, E1A protein inhibited IRF-3-mediated stimulation of the IFNA4 promoter in transient expression assays; this inhibition could be reversed partially by overexpression of CBP/p300 and was not demonstrated with the mutant of E1A that does not bind p300. These results identify IRF-3 and CBP/p300 as integral components of the virus-induced complex that stimulates type 1 IFN gene transcription. The observation that adenovirus E1A antagonizes IRF-3 mediated activation suggests that E1A and IRF-3 may compete for binding to CBP/p300 and implicates a novel mechanism by which adenovirus may overcome the antiviral effects of the IFN pathway.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAdenovirus E1A ProteinsAnimalsBase SequenceCells, CulturedChlorocebus aethiopsCREB-Binding ProteinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA PrimersHumansInterferon Regulatory Factor-3InterferonsL CellsMiceNewcastle disease virusNuclear ProteinsAdenovirus E1A ProteinsCREB-Binding ProteinCREBBP protein, humanCrebbp protein, mouseCrebbp protein, ratDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA PrimersInterferon Regulatory Factor-3InterferonsIRF3 protein, humanIrf3 protein, mouseNuclear ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID9707562
PMCPMC21423
OpenAlexW1982170462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.