Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9705494›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research1998

Non-stoichiometric reduced complexity probes for cDNA arrays.

T Trenkle, J Welsh, B Jung, F Mathieu-Daude, M McClelland

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. RNA amplification for successful gene profiling analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2005
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Vav2 is required for cell spreading.The Journal of cell biology · 2001
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

T TrenkleSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, 10835 Altman Row, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
J Welsh
B Jung
F Mathieu-Daude
M McClelland

Funding

RNA FINGERPRINTING USING ARBITRARILY PRIMED PCRR01CA068822 · NCI · VACCINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SAN DIEGO · PI MCCLELLAND, MICHAEL · 1995 to 2008
$2.8M
DETAILED RESTRICTION MAP--SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM GENOMER01AI034829 · NIAID · SIDNEY KIMMEL CANCER CENTER · PI MCCLELLAND, MICHAEL · 1993 to 2006
$1.9M
RNA FINGERPRINTS--DIFFERENTIAL GENE EXPRESSION IN BRAINR01NS033377 · NINDS · SIDNEY KIMMEL CANCER CENTER · PI MCCLELLAND, MICHAEL · 1994 to 1996
–
NCI NIH HHS CA68822NIAID NIH HHS AI34829NINDS NIH HHS NS33377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A method is presented in which the reduced complexity and non-stoichiometric amplification intrinsic to RNA arbitrarily primed PCR fingerprinting (RAP-PCR) is used to advantage to generate probes for differential screening of cDNA arrays. RAP-PCR fingerprints were converted to probes for human cDNA clones arrayed as Escherichia coli colonies on nylon membranes. Each array contained 18 432 cDNA clones from the IMAGE consortium. Hybridization to approximately 1000 cDNA clones was detected using each RAP-PCR probe. Different RAP-PCR fingerprints gave hybridization patterns having very little overlap (<3%) with each other or with hybridization patterns from total cDNA probes. Consequently, repeated application of RAP-PCR probes allows a greater fraction of the message population to be screened on this type of array than can be achieved with a radiolabeled total cDNA probe. This method was applied to RNA from HaCaT keratinocytes treated with epidermal growth factor. Two RAP-PCR probes detected hybridization to 2000 clones, from which 22 candidate differentially expressed genes were observed. Differential expression was tested for 15 of these clones using RT-PCR and 13 were confirmed. The use of this cDNA array to analyze RAP-PCR fingerprints allowed for an increase in detection of 10-20-fold over the conventional denaturing polyacrylamide gel approach to RAP-PCR or differential display. Throughput is vastly improved by the reduction in cloning and sequencing afforded by the use of arrays. Also, repeated cloning and sequencing of the same gene or of genes already known to be regulated in the system of interest is minimized. The procedure we describe uses inexpensive arrays of plasmid clones spotted as E.coli colonies to detect differential expression, but these reduced complexity probes should also prove useful on arrays of PCR-amplified fragments and on oligonucleotide chips. Genesobserved in this manuscript: H11520, U35048, R48633, H28735, M13918, H12999, H05639, X79781, M31627, H23972, AB000712, R75916, U66894, AF067817.

Indexed as

Oligonucleotide ProbesDNA, ComplementaryEpidermal Growth FactorGene Expression RegulationHumansKeratinocytesNucleic Acid HybridizationPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerDNA, ComplementaryEpidermal Growth FactorOligonucleotide ProbesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID9705494
PMCPMC147802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.