ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1998
Clinical evaluation of the BDProbeTec strand displacement amplification assay for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Performance of the BD ProbeTec ET direct detection assay for the analysis ofJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2017Article
- Evaluation of the BD ProbeTec ET system for direct detection of Mycobacterium bovis in veterinary specimens.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2007Article
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and mycobacterial heat shock proteins in lymph node tissue from patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2006Article
- Novel multipurpose methodology for detection of mycobacteria in pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens by smear microscopy, culture, and PCR.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2005Article
- Relevance of commercial amplification methods for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical samples.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2003Review
- Evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET system for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples: a multicenter study.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2003Article
- Clinical evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET system for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The reliability of the BDProbeTec MTB Test (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md.) for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens was evaluated by comparing results to those of conventional mycobacterial culture, with the BACTEC TB 460 and Middlebrook 7H11 biplates. Patients known to have tuberculosis were excluded from analysis. Of 523 specimens from 277 patients, 53 grew a mycobacterium: 24 specimens of M. tuberculosis and 29 specimens of nontuberculous mycobacteria. After initial testing, 42 specimens were positive by the BDProbeTec, for overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 95.8, 96. 2, 54.8, and 99.8%, respectively. After resolution of discrepancies, 28 specimens were positive by the BDProbeTec, for overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 100, 99.2, 85.7, and 100%, respectively. These same values were 100, 80.8, 93.4, and 100%, respectively, for smear-positive samples and 100, 99.4, 75.0, and 100%, respectively, for smear-negative specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.