ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1998
Low false-negative rate of PCR analysis for detecting human papillomavirus-related cervical lesions.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Condyloma HPV Typing: A Clinical Necessity?The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Analysis of the agreement between colposcopic impression and histopathological diagnosis of cervical biopsy in a single tertiary center of Chengdu.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2021Article
- HPV-16 E2/E6 and POU5F1B as Biomarkers to Determine Cervical High-Grade Squamous Lesions and More.Journal of inflammation research · 2020Article
- PCR-reverse dot blot human papillomavirus genotyping as a primary screening test for cervical cancer in a hospital-based cohort.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2019Article
- Detection of HPV by PCR-A Novel Step in the Prevention of Cancer Cervix.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2012Article
- Human papilloma virus-16/18 cervical infection among women attending a family medical clinic in Riyadh.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Although PCR analysis is a sensitive test for detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) in the cervix, the proportion of cases of cervical dysplasia missed, or the false-negative rate, has been unknown. We determined the accuracy of PCR analysis for HPV DNA as a predictor of HPV-related cervical lesions in a cross-sectional study of sexually active women, aged 18 to 50 years, from the University of Michigan Family Medicine HPV study. Of 133 eligible participants, 41 underwent colposcopy because of a positive result for HPV of the cervix by the PCR method and 92 underwent screening colposcopy with biopsy prior to knowing the HPV PCR results. Twenty-four of those screened were subsequently found to also be HPV DNA positive. In those found to be HPV positive, histological studies revealed the presence of condyloma or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in 16 women (24.6%) and changes suggestive of condyloma in 5 (7.6%). No HPV-negative woman had an abnormal biopsy or cytology report (P = 0. 000001). The false-negative rate (1 - sensitivity) for HPV PCR analysis for detection of the presence of a cervical HPV-related lesion was 0% (95% confidence interval, 0 to 0.047), and the specificity was 60.7%. In summary, PCR analysis for HPV DNA had a very low false-negative rate for predicting HPV-related lesions of the cervix in a community-based population. This supports the validity of using the absence of HPV at the cervix, as determined by PCR testing, as an inclusion criterion for patients in control groups in studies dealing with low-grade cervical lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.