Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9700491›Full record

ArticleGlia1998

Increased intercellular communication in mouse astrocytes exposed to hyposmotic shocks.

E Scemes, D C Spray

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Glia, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bursting at the Seams: Molecular Mechanisms Mediating Astrocyte Swelling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Novel astrocyte targets: new avenues for the therapeutic treatment of epilepsy.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2015
    Review
  5. Voltage-dependent facilitation of Cx46 hemichannels.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2010
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Specific gap junctions enhance the neuronal vulnerability to brain traumatic injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2002
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

E ScemesDepartment of Physiology, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
D C Spray
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

GAP JUNCTIONS AND SCHWANN CELLSR01NS034931 · NINDS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI SPRAY, DAVID C · 1996 to 2002
$957k
NINDS NIH HHS NS07512NINDS NIH HHS NS34931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When exposed to 20% and 35%, but not to 50% hyposmotic solutions, mouse astrocytes recovered their volume within a few minutes, which coincided with the activation of nonjunctional conductances. Conductance of gap junctions between astrocyte pairs also increased after exposure to a 35% hyposmotic shock; however, this effect began at 3 min after the shock, when cells had partially recovered their initial volumes. During the first minute of exposure to 20% and 35% hyposmotic stimuli, there was a transient monophasic increase in intracellular calcium levels; exposure to 50% hyposmotic solution led to intracellular Ca2+ oscillations. The differences in time courses of nonjunctional conductance changes, Ca2+ alterations, and intercellular coupling suggest that distinct second messenger pathways are involved in each response. The velocity of mechanically evoked calcium waves propagated among the astrocytes increased at 7.5 min after 35% hyposmotic shock. This increase was not seen with 20% or 50% hyposmotic stimuli and is not ascribable to the increase in junctional conductance because it was blocked by suramin, a P2 purinergic receptor antagonist. Given that the transduction pathways activated during cell swelling (e.g., generation of phospholipases, phosphokinases, arachidonic acid) exert inhibitory effects on astrocytic gap junctions (Giaume and McCarthy, 1996), it is proposed that the increased junctional conductance during hyposmotic shock is due to increased number of channels, perhaps triggered by the initial Ca2+ signals (Dolmetsch et al., 1997). As a functional consequence of the increased coupling and enhanced extracellular propagation of Ca2+ waves, spread of signaling molecules throughout the glial network is expected to be significantly enhanced during hyposmotic stress. The increased intercellular communication between mouse astrocytes in response to hyposmotic challenge thus occurs via both gap junction-dependent and -independent mechanisms and presumably provides neuroprotective effects following nervous system injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesCalciumCell CommunicationCell MembraneCells, CulturedElectric ConductivityExtracellular SpaceMiceMice, Inbred StrainsOsmolar ConcentrationStimulation, ChemicalTime FactorsCalcium

Identifiers

PMID9700491
PMCPMC1513545
OpenAlexW2028315402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.