Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9696827›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology1998

DNA vaccination affords significant protection against feline immunodeficiency virus infection without inducing detectable antiviral antibodies.

M J Hosie, J N Flynn, M A Rigby, C Cannon, T Dunsford, N A Mackay, D Argyle, B J Willett, T Miyazawa, D E Onions and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. DNA vaccines in veterinary use.Expert review of vaccines · 2009
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M J HosieRetrovirus Research Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom. m.hosie@vet.gla.ac.uk
J N Flynn
M A Rigby
C Cannon
T Dunsford
N A Mackay
D Argyle
B J Willett
T Miyazawa
D E Onions
O Jarrett
J C Neil
University of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To test the potential of a multigene DNA vaccine against lentivirus infection, we generated a defective mutant provirus of feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) with an in-frame deletion in pol (FIVDeltaRT). In a first experiment, FIVDeltaRT DNA was administered intramuscularly to 10 animals, half of which also received feline gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) DNA. The DNA was administered in four 100-microg doses at 0, 10, and 23 weeks. Immunization with FIVDeltaRT elicited cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) responses to FIV Gag and Env in the absence of a serological response. After challenge with homologous virus at week 26, all 10 of the control animals became seropositive and viremic but 4 of the 10 vaccinates remained seronegative and virus free. Furthermore, quantitative virus isolation and quantitative PCR analysis of viral DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells revealed significantly lower virus loads in the FIVDeltaRT vaccinates than in the controls. Immunization with FIVDeltaRT in conjunction with IFN-gamma gave the highest proportion of protected cats, with only two of five vaccinates showing evidence of infection following challenge. In a second experiment involving two groups (FIVDeltaRT plus IFN-gamma and IFN-gamma alone), the immunization schedule was reduced to 0, 4, and 8 weeks. Once again, CTL responses were seen prior to challenge in the absence of detectable antibodies. Two of five cats receiving the proviral DNA vaccine were protected against infection, with an overall reduction in virus load compared to the five infected controls. These findings demonstrate that DNA vaccination can elicit protection against lentivirus infection in the absence of a serological response and suggest the need to reconsider efficacy criteria for lentivirus vaccines.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodies, ViralBase SequenceCatsCell LineDNA, ViralDrug Administration ScheduleHumansImmunodeficiency Virus, FelineLentivirus InfectionsMolecular Sequence DataProvirusesT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicVaccinationVaccines, DNAAntibodies, ViralDNA, ViralVaccines, DNAViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID9696827
PMCPMC109955
OpenAlexW2156048886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.