The changing classification and diagnosis of diabetes. New classification is based on pathogenesis, not insulin dependence.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Beware of overdiagnosis harms from screening, lower diagnostic thresholds, and incidentalomas.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
   Article
2. Trends in type 2 diabetes mellitus disease burden in European Union countries between 1990 and 2019.Scientific reports · 2021
   Observational
3. Severe obesity and cardio-metabolic comorbidities: a nationwide study of 2.8 million adolescents.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2019
   Article
4. Intensification to injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes: mixed methods study (protocol).BMC health services research · 2019
   Article
5. Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Western Indian Type 2 Diabetic Population: A Hospital - based Cross - Sectional Study.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2013
   Article
6. Environmental contaminants as etiologic factors for diabetes.Environmental health perspectives · 2001
   Review
7. A survey of diabetes care in general practice in England and Wales.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000
   Article
8. New diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus. New criteria result in fewer cases in older adults.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999
   Article
9. Diabetes in cystic fibrosis.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 1999
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Will new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus change phenotype of patients with diabetes? Reanalysis of European epidemiological data. DECODE Study Group on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemiology Study Group.1998

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as