ArticleThe journal of behavioral health services & research1998
Using incarceration rates to measure mental health program performance.
Article in The journal of behavioral health services & research, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance indicators for public mental healthcare: a systematic international inventory.BMC public health · 2012Article
- Approaches to risk-adjusting outcome measures applied to criminal justice involvement after community service.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2001Article
- Comparing alternative risk-adjustment models.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2001Article
- Risk adjustment of Florida mental health outcomes data: concepts, methods, and results.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2001Article
- A five-year population study of persons involved in the mental health and local correctional systems: implications for service planning.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2001Article
- Utilization of local jails and general hospitals by state psychiatric center patients.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2000Article
- Personal privacy versus public accountability: a technological solution to an ethical dilemma.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article introduces a more refined conceptualization of the criminal justice involvement of clients of mental health programs than is evident in the existing literature, and demonstrates a research methodology that provides program administrators with standardized measures of program performance in this area. The conceptualization of the criminal justice involvement of people served by community mental health programs distinguishes between three distinct areas of concern: (1) program accessibility to people with a history of criminal justice involvement, (2) criminal justice outcomes, and (3) quality of program performance. The methodology makes use of existing data resources to provide a valid and reliable measure of program performance in these three areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9685749What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.