ArticleHealth services research1998
A comparison of cardiovascular procedure use between the United States and Canada.
Article in Health services research, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trends in in-hospital outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stents era.Clinical cardiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the relative volume and intensity of all types of cardiovascular procedures, noninvasive tests, and diagnostic imaging for all elderly individuals between the United States and the three largest Canadian provinces (Ontario, Quebec, and British Columbia) by patient age. DATA SOURCES: Service volume data for the United States for a one percent random sample of claims obtained from Medicare's National Claims History System. Data for Canada were obtained from the Ministries of Health in the three provinces representing 100 percent of the claims received by each Ministry. STUDY
designDesign is a cross-sectional analysis of 1992 claims data. DATA EXTRACTION
methodsThe volume of cardiovascular services was measured in terms of the relative value units (RVUs) used in the Medicare fee schedule to calculate payments. Services were disaggregated into nine clinical categories, and comparisons were made by type of cardiovascular service and patient age.
resultsOverall, cardiovascular procedure RVUs per elderly beneficiary are 53 percent greater in the United States than in Canada. Differences are largest for surgical procedures such as carotid thromboendarterectomy and revascularization procedures and smallest for diagnostic imaging and noninvasive tests. The differences between the countries in the use of cardiovascular procedures increase markedly with age. For example, the United States-to-Canada ratio for PTCA use is 1.87 for persons age 65 to 69, but 7.68 for persons age 80 and older. For CABG, the ratios are 1.36 and 7.16, respectively.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that global budgets in Canada result in lower levels of cardiovascular service use among the elderly, particularly among the very aged elderly. Patient age appears to play a much more important role in determining the recipients of cardiovascular procedures in Canada than in the United States. Whether these higher rates of procedure use among the very elderly in the United States compared to Canada reflect profligate service use or contribute to improved outcomes is uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9685118PMC1070272What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.