Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9681969›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives1998

Recent developments in the investigation of thyroid regulation and thyroid carcinogenesis.

G C Hard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Radioiodine therapy versus antithyroid medications for Graves' disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. New Evidence on the Association between Prediagnostic Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Levels and Thyroid Cancer Risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

G C HardAmerican Health Foundation, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review covers new mechanistic information spanning the past 10 years relevant to normal and abnormal thyroid growth and function that may assist in the risk assessment of chemicals inducing thyroid follicular cell neoplasia. Recent studies have shown that thyroid regulation occurs via a complex interactive network mediated through several different messenger systems. Increased thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels activate the signal transduction pathways to stimulate growth and differentiation of the follicular cell. The important role of TSH in growth as well as in function helps to explain how disruptions in the thyroid-pituitary axis may influence thyroid neoplasia in rodents. New investigations that couple mechanistic studies with information from animal cancer bioassays (e. g., sulfamethazine studies) confirm the linkage between prolonged disruption of the thyroid-pituitary axis and thyroid neoplasia. New initiation/promotion studies in rodents also support the concept that chronic stimulation of the thyroid induced by goitrogens can result in thyroid tumors. Some of these studies confirm previous suggestions regarding the importance of chemically induced thyroid peroxidase inhibition and the inhibition of 3,3',5, 5'-tetraiodothyronine (T4, thyroxine) deiodinases on disruption of the thyroid-pituitary axis leading to thyroid neoplasia. Some comparative physiologic and mechanistic data highlight certain differences between rodents and humans that could be expected to confer an increased vulnerability of rodents to chronic hypersecretion of TSH. New data from epidemiologic and molecular genetic studies in humans contribute further to an understanding of thyroid neoplasia. Acute exposure to ionizing radiation, especially in childhood, remains the only verified cause of thyroid carcinogenesis in humans. Iodine deficiency studies as a whole remain inconclusive, even though several new studies in humans examine the role of dietary iodine deficiency in thyroid cancer. Specific alterations in gene expression have been identified in human thyroid neoplasia, linked to tumor phenotype, and thus oncogene activation and tumor-suppressor gene inactivation may also be factors in the development and progression of thyroid cancer in humans. An analysis by the U.S. EPA Risk Assessment Forum, prepared as a draft report in 1988 and completed in 1997, focused on the use of a threshold for risk assessment of thyroid follicular tumors. New studies, involving several chemicals, provide further support that there will be no antithyroid activity until critical intracellular concentrations are reached. Thus, for chemically induced thyroid neoplasia linked to disruptions in the thyroid-pituitary axis, a practical threshold for thyroid cancer would be expected. More information on thyroid autoregulation, the role of oncogene mutations and growth factors, and studies directly linking persistently high TSH levels with the sequential cellular development of thyroid follicular cell neoplasia would provide further confirmation.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, FollicularAnimalsCarcinogensGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansRisk AssessmentThyroid GlandThyroid HormonesThyroid NeoplasmsThyrotropinCarcinogensThyroid HormonesThyrotropin

Identifiers

PMID9681969
PMCPMC1533202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.