ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998
Primary care: core values. Patients' priorities.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- What Attributes Matter Most in Physicians? Exploratory Findings from a Single-Centre Survey of Stakeholder Priorities in Cancer Care at a Canadian Academic Cancer Centre.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- The most important attribute: stakeholder perspectives on what matters most in a physician.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2020Article
- Patients' assessments of the continuity of primary care in Finland: a 15-year follow-up questionnaire survey.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014Article
- Chiropractic treatment as a primary care intervention for better musculoskeletal health in the aging population in the United kingdom: an opinion and positioning paper.Frontiers in physiology · 2012Article
- Predicting uptake of MMR vaccination: a prospective questionnaire study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004Article
- Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Article
- Continuity of care in general practice: a survey of patients' views.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002Article
- General practitioners are victims too.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.