ReviewDrugs & aging1998
Markers of bone remodelling in metabolic bone disease.
Review in Drugs & aging, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Lycopene consumption decreases oxidative stress and bone resorption markers in postmenopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2007Article
- Fast and slow bone losers. Relevance to the management of osteoporosis.Drugs & aging · 1998Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New specific markers of bone remodelling have been developed that allow the evaluation of bone formation (plasma levels of osteocalcin and bone alkaline phosphatases) or bone resorption (collagen crosslink levels in urine). These markers can be used to evaluate bone disease. Their best application is currently in renal osteodystrophy, where there is a broad spectrum of bone abnormalities. In patients with this disease, bone markers can obviate the need for bone biopsy. So far, bone alkaline phosphatase is the most sensitive and specific marker for predicting the type of bone disease and therefore for deciding treatment in dialysed patients, although it is not ideal. Bone markers have also allowed a dramatic improvement in the comprehensive approach to bone loss with aging in women. Monitoring of the marked increase in bone turnover, and its persistence, in older women after menopause may help in the design of treatment strategies for osteoporosis. There is some hope that the measurement of urinary levels of collagen crosslinks will help to predict the clinical outcome of osteoporosis with respect to fractures in postmenopausal women. Bone markers could, besides being a measurement of bone density, help to determine the optimal treatment of postmenopausal women. Bone markers could also be used to predict or ascertain the response to treatment of osteoporosis, but few data are currently available to judge the routine usefulness of these new applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9673861What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.