Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9666338›Full record

ReviewEndocrine1998

Prohormone and proneuropeptide processing. Recent progress and future challenges.

M C Beinfeld

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M C BeinfeldDepartment of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Tufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our knowledge of prohormone and proneuropeptide processing and its relationship to the secretory pathway has advanced significantly in the last five years. The recent discovery of the prohormone convertase family of proteolytic enzymes has provided new candidates for the prohormone and proneuropeptide convertases. The increasing appreciation of the role of proteolysis in diverse cellular processes has also brought the prohormone processing field closer to the fields of growth factor processing, the role of host proteases in viral and bacterial pathogenesis and toxicity, control of the cell cycle, inflammation, and apoptosis. The last five years have been very productive, but the most interesting questions are still unanswered. Which enzymes are actually responsible for prohormone cleavages in specific tissues? What structural features of the prohormones determine where it will be processed or how it is recognized as secretory material by the sorting machinery? How is tissue-specific processing determined and regulated? The availability of protease knockout mice and and a more detailed understanding of the complex biosynthetic activation of these enzymes will provide at least some of the answers.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndopeptidasesFurinHormonesNeuropeptidesOrgan SpecificityProtein PrecursorsSubtilisinsEndopeptidasesFurinHormonesNeuropeptidesProtein PrecursorsSubtilisins

Identifiers

PMID9666338
OpenAlexW2334061140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.