ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1998
Direct detection of eae-positive bacteria in human and veterinary colorectal specimens by PCR.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The ovarian cancer oncobiome.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Bacteria and tumours: causative agents or opportunistic inhabitants?Infectious agents and cancer · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A PCR test based on the amplification of an eae-specific sequence was designed and evaluated for its ability to directly detect homologous sequences in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and Citrobacter spp. (amplification of eae open reading frame, 178 bp) in sections of the intestines of humans and animals with colonic lesions. Positive PCR results were observed with eae-positive reference strains of E. coli and Citrobacter rodentium (Citrobacter freundii biotype 4280). Known eae-negative reference strains of E. coli and other laboratory strains of enteric bacteria were negative by the amplification test. The sensitivity of the PCR for detection of eae-positive E. coli and C. rodentium was between 1 and 2 CFU. To detect these sequences directly from sections of fixed colon from human and veterinary sources, PCR conditions were modified by the addition of 0.1 mM 8-methoxypsoralen to eliminate extraneous bacterial DNA from the PCR amplification cocktail without added template. Sections of colon from three pigs experimentally affected with colon lesions due to enteropathogenic (attaching and effacing) E. coli were PCR positive for bacterial eae genome. Sections from control animals were negative. Sections of colon from one of 18 biopsies from confirmed AIDS patients and from 22 of 35 colorectal cancer patients were PCR positive for bacterial eae genome. The PCR test was a simple and quick method of detecting bacterial eae genome in human and veterinary clinical specimens. This method may remove the need for initial culture and detection of the gene by DNA probing from potential associated lesions. The clear relationship of bacteria containing the eae gene with colonic lesions in the pigs and mice indicates that a similar relationship is possible for human patients having similar lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.