Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9665954›Full record

Trial reportClinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology1998

Collection of cervical secretions does not adversely affect Pap smears taken immediately afterward.

A Hildesheim, M C Bratti, R P Edwards, M Schiffman, A C Rodriguez, R Herrero, M Alfaro, L A Morera, S V Ermatinger, B T Miller and 1 more

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Papanicolaou smears: to swab or not to swab.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2007
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

A HildesheimInterdisciplinary Studies Section, Environmental Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7374, USA. Hildesha@epndce.nci.nih.gov
M C Bratti
R P Edwards
M Schiffman
A C Rodriguez
R Herrero
M Alfaro
L A Morera
S V Ermatinger
B T Miller
P A Crowley-Nowick

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collection of cervical secretions for local immunological assessment requires that the secretions be collected prior to the Pap smear to avoid contamination with blood. The objective of the present study was to determine whether gentle collection of cervical secretions prior to a Pap smear collection influences the quality of the Pap smear. A total of 266 women were recruited. Half of the participants were assigned to collection of cervical secretions prior to Pap smear collection with Weck-cel sponges. The remaining half had only the Pap smear collection performed. Pap smear slides were reviewed and evaluated for quality by the Bethesda System adequacy criteria without knowledge of randomization. The proportions of limited or inadequate slides in the two study groups were compared by using the Pearson chi-square test. No significant differences were observed between the two study groups when overall Pap smear quality was evaluated (P = 0.29). Comparison of the two study groups with respect to individual adequacy criteria, including presence of air drying artifact, presence of obscuring blood, absence of metaplastic or endocervical cells from the transformation zone, scant cellularity, and presence of obscuring inflammatory cells, also revealed no significant differences between the two study groups. Results from the present study suggest that the collection of cervical secretions with Weck-cel sponges does not adversely impact the quality of subsequently obtained Pap smears.

Indexed as

Papanicolaou TestAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsCervix UteriFemaleHumansImmunologic TechniquesMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsSurgical SpongesTumor Virus InfectionsUterine Cervical DiseasesUterine Hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID9665954
PMCPMC95605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.