ReviewJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry1998
"Summary measure" statistic for assessing the outcome of treatment trials in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Review in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disability improvement as a clinically relevant outcome in clinical trials of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2021Trial
- Botulinum toxin type A in post-stroke lower limb spasticity: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Journal of neurology · 2010Trial
- Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis over four years: application of a reproducible automated technique in monitoring disease progression in a cohort of the interferon beta-1a (Rebif) treatment trial.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2003Trial
- Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of interferon beta-1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis analysed by area under disability/time curves.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 1999Trial
- Anti-inflammatory disease-modifying treatment and short-term disability progression in SPMS.Neurology · 2017Observational
- Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis: collaboration of the CIBMTR and EBMT to facilitate international clinical studies.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2010Review
- Possible clinical outcome measures for clinical trials in patients with multiple sclerosis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2010Article
- The neurotoxic effect of cuprizone on oligodendrocytes depends on the presence of pro-inflammatory cytokines secreted by microglia.Neurochemical research · 2007Article
- Long-Term Cost Effectiveness of Interferon-beta-1a in the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis : An Econometric Model.Clinical drug investigation · 2003Article
- Comparative assessment of immunomodulating therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.CNS drugs · 2002Review
- Disability outcome measures in therapeutic trials of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: effects of heterogeneity of disease course in placebo cohorts.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo review the outcome measures commonly used in phase III treatment trials of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and to introduce a method of data analysis which is clinically appropriate for the often reversible disability in this type of multiple sclerosis.
methodsThe conventional end point measures for disability change are inadequate and potentially misleading. Those using the disability difference between study entry and completion do not take into account serial data or disease fluctuations. Rigid definitions of "disease progression" based on two measurements of change in disability several months apart, do not assess worsening after the defined "end point", nor the significant proportion of erroneous "treatment failures" which result from subsequent recovery from relapses that outlast the end point. Assessing attacks merely by counting their frequency ignores the variation in magnitude and duration. These problems can be largely circumvented by integrating the area under a disability-time curve (AUC), a technique which utilises all serial measurements at scheduled visits and during relapses to summarise the total neurological dysfunction experienced by an individual patient on any particular clinical scale during a study period.
conclusionsThe "summary measure" statistic AUC incorporates both transient and progressive disability into an overall estimate of the dysfunction that was experienced by a patient during a period of time. It is statistically more powerful and clinically more meaningful than conventional methods of assessing disability changes, particularly for trials which are too short to expect to disclose major treatment effects on irreversible disability in patients with a fluctuating disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.