ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998
Only one quarter of women with learning disability in Exeter have cervical screening.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Related factors and use of free preventive health services among adults with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan.BMC health services research · 2014Article
- The characteristics and relevant factors of Pap smear test use for women with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan.BMC health services research · 2014Article
- Compiling a register of patients with moderate or severe learning disabilities: experience at one United Kingdom general practice.Mental health in family medicine · 2011Article
- Women with learning disabilities and Read coding: lessons from a cohort study.BMC public health · 2008Article
- Women with learning disabilities and access to cervical screening: retrospective cohort study using case control methods.BMC public health · 2008Article
- Patients with learning disability in the community.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Article
- Cervical screening for women with learning disability. Numbers screened can be optimised by using a focused initiative.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.