ArticleLancet (London, England)1998
J-curve not burned off by HOT study. Hypertension Optimal Treatment.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diastolic blood pressure levels and ischemic stroke incidence in older adults with white matter lesions.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2011Article
- Commentary: counterpoint. Simple-minded antihypertensive treatment: of assumptions, potpourri, and sausages.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2009Article
- [Arterial hypertension and dementia].Der Nervenarzt · 2005Review
- The Hypertension Optimal Treatment Study: what did it give us?Current hypertension reports · 1999Article
- Intensive antihypertensive treatment to the new lower blood pressure targets.Current hypertension reports · 1999Review
- Review
- The need for evidence in hypertension management: historical perspective.Annals of Saudi medicineReview
- Beyond the usual strategies for blood pressure reduction: therapeutic considerations and combination therapies.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9635941What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.