ArticleBiophysical journal1998
A novel voltage clamp technique for mapping ionic currents from cultured skeletal myotubes.
Article in Biophysical journal, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- An electrical inspection of the subsurface cisternae of the outer hair cell.Biophysical journal · 2015Article
- A targeted extracellular approach for recording long-term firing patterns of excitable cells: a practical guide.Biological procedures onlineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The biophysical properties and cellular distribution of ion channels largely determine the input/output relationships of electrically excitable cells. A variety of patch pipette voltage clamp techniques are available to characterize ionic currents. However, when used by themselves, such techniques are not well suited to the task of mapping low-density channel distributions. We describe here a new voltage clamp method (the whole cell loose patch (WCLP) method) that combines whole-cell recording through a tight-seal pipette with focal extracellular stimulation through a loose-seal pipette. By moving the stimulation pipette across the cell surface and using a stationary whole-cell pipette to record the evoked patch currents, this method should be suitable for mapping channel distributions, even on large cells possessing low channel densities. When we applied this method to the study of currents in cultured chick myotubes, we found that the cell cable properties and the series resistance of the recording pipette caused significant filtering of the membrane currents, and that the filter characteristics depended in part upon the distance between the stimulating and recording pipettes. We describe here how we determined the filter impulse response for each loose-seal pipette placement and subsequently recovered accurate estimates of patch membrane current through deconvolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.