Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9634582›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell1998

Initiation and maintenance of virus-induced gene silencing

Ruiz, Voinnet, Baulcombe

RetractedErratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 346 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
346citing papers in PubMed
45.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

346 citing papers in PubMed, 989 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. APathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Truncated CMV2bPlant methods · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

286 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Correction · 2015-07-01Duplication of/in Image · Error in Image · Manipulation of Images · · Olivier Voinnet has finding of scientific misconduct http://www2.cnrs.fr/en/2593.htm
  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

RuizSainsbury Laboratory, John Innes Centre, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom.
Voinnet
Baulcombe
Sainsbury Laboratory · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene of Nicotiana benthamiana was silenced in plants infected with potato virus X (PVX) vectors carrying PDS inserts, and a green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgene was silenced in plants infected with PVX-GFP. This virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) is post-transcriptional and cytoplasmic because it is targeted against exons rather than introns of PDS RNA and against viral RNAs. Although PDS and GFP RNAs are most likely targeted through the same mechanism, the VIGS phenotypes differed in two respects. PDS mRNA was targeted by VIGS in all green tissue of the PVX-PDS-infected plant, whereas PVX-PDS was not affected. In contrast, VIGS of the GFP was targeted against PVX-GFP. Initially, VIGS of the GFP was initiated in all green tissues, as occurred with PDS VIGS. However, after 30 days of infection, the GFP VIGS was no longer initiated in newly emerging leaves, although it was maintained in tissue in which it had already been initiated. Based on these analyses, we propose a model for VIGS in which the initiation of VIGS is dependent on the virus and maintenance of it is virus independent.

Identifiers

PMID9634582
PMCPMC144041
OpenAlexW2138835651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.