Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9624767›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1998

Comparison of video-recorded consultations with those in which patients' consent is withheld.

T Coleman, T Manku-Scott

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Communication and patient participation influencing patient recall of treatment discussions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Investigating the relationship between consultation length and patient experience: a cross-sectional study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analysis of enacted difficult conversations in neonatal intensive care.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2009
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Factors influencing discussion of smoking between general practitioners and patients who smoke: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000
    Article
  17. Factors associated with the provision of anti-smoking advice by general practitioners.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1999
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T ColemanUniversity of Leicester, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Leicester General Hospital.
T Manku-Scott
Leicester General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVideo-recorded consultations are widely used for research in general practice. Recently, video recordings have begun to be used for the purposes of general practitioner (GP) registrar assessment. It is unknown, however, whether consultations in which patients withhold consent for recording differ from those that are recorded.

aimTo compare clinical problems and demographic characteristics of adult patients who consent to the video recording of consultations with those who withhold consent.

methodThis was prospective study of 538 adult patients consulting 42 GPs, based in practices throughout Leicestershire. Each patient attended a surgery session with one of the 42 GPs between April 1995 and March 1996. Clinical presentations and demographic characteristics of patients consenting and withholding consent to the video recording of their consultations were compared. GPs' perceptions of whether patients in these two groups were distressed/upset or embarrassed were also compared.

resultsA total of 85.9% (462/538) of adults consented to video recording, and 14.1% (76/538) withheld consent. Multiple logistic regression revealed that patients who presented with a mental health problem were more likely to withhold consent to recording (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.4-4.6). Younger patients were also more likely to withhold consent to video recording. Additionally, where patients' consent was withheld, GPs perceived patients to be more distressed or embarrassed.

conclusionYounger patients and those suffering from mental health problems are more likely than others to withhold consent to being video recorded for research purposes in general practice. The implications of this study for the assessment of registrar GPs using video-recorded consultations are discussed.

Indexed as

Family PracticeVideotape RecordingAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAttitudeHumansMental DisordersMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceSmoking

Identifiers

PMID9624767
PMCPMC1409972
OpenAlexW1781903436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.