Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9624750›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1998

General practitioner turnover and migration in England 1990-94.

D H Taylor, B Leese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. GPs on the move.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Article
  13. Why do general practitioners from France choose to work in London practices? A qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
    Article
  14. The future for non-principal general practitioners: lost doctors--lost to whom?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1999
    Article
  15. Recruitment and retention of general practitioners in the UK: what are the problems and solutions?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1999
    Review
  16. Retention of young general practitioners entering the NHS from 1991-1992.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1999
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D H TaylorCenter for Health Policy, Research and Education, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
B Leese

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn tandem with fears about a GP workforce crisis, increasing attention is being focused on the supply and distribution of primary care services: on general practitioners in particular. Differential turnover and migration across health authority boundaries could lead to a maldistribution of GPs, yet comprehensive studies of GP turnover are non-existent.

aimTo quantify general practitioner (GP) turnover and migration in England from 1990 to 1994.

methodYearly data from 1 October 1990 to 1 October 1994 were collected on GPs in England practising full time, including average yearly turnover, rates of entry to and exit from general practice, and net migration among GPs. All were calculated at the family health service authority (now the new health authorities) level.

resultsAverage yearly GP turnover ranges from 2.9% in Shropshire to 7.8% in Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster; turnover is associated with deprivation and high-need areas. Migration of GPs across health authority borders was rare. Entry and exit rates were also positively related to measures of deprivation and need. Relatively underprovided health authorities lost 23 GPs over the study period as a result of migration; relatively overprovided ones gained three.

conclusionTurnover is driven primarily by exits from general practice and is related to deprivation and high need. Retention appears to be the main problem in ensuring an adequate GP supply in relatively deprived and underprovided health authorities.

Indexed as

Personnel TurnoverEnglandFamily PracticePhysicians, FamilyPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID9624750
PMCPMC1410007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.