ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1998
Pharmacokinetics and safety of a new parenteral carbapenem antibiotic, biapenem (L-627), in elderly subjects.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Structure of apo- and monometalated forms of NDM-1--a highly potent carbapenem-hydrolyzing metallo-β-lactamase.PloS one · 2011Article
- Biapenem.Drugs · 2002Review
- Emerging strategies in infectious diseases: new carbapenem and trinem antibacterial agents.Drugs · 2001Review
- Comparative pharmacokinetics of the carbapenems: clinical implications.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2000Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a new parenteral carbapenem antibiotic, biapenem (L-627), were studied in healthy elderly volunteers aged 65 to 74 years (71.6 +/- 2.7 years [mean +/- standard deviation], n = 5; group B) and > or = 75 years (77.8 +/- 1.9 years, n = 5; group C), following single intravenous doses (300 and 600 mg), and compared with those of healthy young male volunteers aged 20 to 29 years (23.0 +/- 3.5 years, n = 5; group A). The agent was well tolerated in all three age groups. Serial blood and urine samples were analyzed for biapenem to obtain key pharmacokinetic parameters by both two-compartment model-dependent and -independent methods. The maximum plasma concentration and area under plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) increased in proportion to the dose in all three groups. Statistically significant age-related effects for AUC, total body clearance, and renal clearance (CLR) were found, while elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) and percent cumulative recovery from urine of unchanged drug (% UR) remained unaltered (t1/2 beta, 1.51 +/- 0.42 [300 mg] and 2.19 +/- 0.64 [600 mg] h [group A], 1.82 +/- 1.14 and 1.45 +/- 0.36 h [group B], and 1.75 +/- 0.23 and 1.59 +/- 0.18 h [group C]; % UR, 52.6% +/- 3.0% [300 mg] and 53.1% +/- 5.1% [600 mg] [group A], 46.7% +/- 7.4% and 53.0% +/- 4.8% [group B], and 50.1% +/- 5.2% and 47.1% +/- 7.6% [group C]). A significant linear correlation was observed between the CLR of biapenem and creatinine clearance at the dose of 300 mg but not at 600 mg. The steady-state volume of distribution tended to be decreased with age, although not significantly. Therefore, the age-related changes in parameters of biapenem described above were attributable to the combination of decreased lean body mass and lowered renal function of the elderly subjects. However, the magnitude of those changes does not necessitate dosage adjustment in elderly patients with normal renal function for their age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.