ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1998
Initial concentration-time profile of gentamicin determines efficacy against Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 13047.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A concept for pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic dosage adjustment in renal impairment: the case of aminoglycosides.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vitro studies were designed to investigate the influence of peak drug concentration (Cmax), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and, consequently, the trough concentration on the bactericidal effects of gentamicin against Enterobacter cloacae (MIC, 0.5 mg/liter) by simulating bolus versus infusion administration and bolus dosing with altered drug clearance. Bacteria in the lag phase were exposed to gentamicin concentration-time profiles modelling either bolus or infusion dosing (AUC constant, Cmax changing) with 30-min postdose peak concentrations (Cpeak30) of 4, 6, 8, and 10 mg/liter or bolus dosing with normal and double drug clearance (Cmax constant, AUC changing) corresponding to normal clearance profiles with Cpeak30 of 6 and 8 mg/liter. Exposure to gentamicin caused early bactericidal effects apparent by 2 h, followed by variable bacteriostatic and recovery phases. Exposure to bolus profiles resulted in greater bactericidal activity than the corresponding infusion profile up to a Cpeak30 of 8 mg/liter. At a Cpeak30 of 10 mg/liter, there were no differences in bactericidal effect. Double clearance profiles had a reduced bactericidal effect at 6 mg/liter compared to the corresponding normal clearance profile, but no differences in bactericidal effect were observed for 8-mg/liter double and normal clearance profiles. These results suggest that the initial exposure (i.e., 0 to 30 min) is a more important determinant for bacterial killing than the AUC or trough concentration for this bacterium. Subject to confirmation of these findings with other gram-negative bacteria, to optimize aminoglycoside efficacy the initial exposure (Cmax) should be maximized by giving higher doses or bolus administration at intervals which may not produce detectable trough concentrations. Clinical trials with a broad range of patients, especially those with higher clearance, would confirm these in vitro observations and define optimal dosing recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.