Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9624068›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1998

Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. I: three month follow up of health outcomes.

S Shepperd, D Harwood, C Jenkinson, A Gray, M Vessey, P Morgan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01826305 (Independent Exercise Compared With Formal Rehabilitation Following Primary Total Knee Replacement), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01826305 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Independent Exercise Compared With Formal Rehabilitation Following Primary Total Knee Replacement

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2014 to 2015Enrolled23ConditionsRecovery Following Primary Total Knee ArthroplastyArmsFormal Rehabilitation Therapy, Independent Exercise Cohort
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Early discharge hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Early discharge hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  11. Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Guideline
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S ShepperdDivision of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF. Sasha.Shepperd@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
D Harwood
C Jenkinson
A Gray
M Vessey
P Morgan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care in terms of patient outcomes.

designRandomised controlled trial with three month follow up.

settingDistrict general hospital and catchment area of neighbouring community trust. SUBJECTS: Patients recovering from hip replacement (n=86), knee replacement (n=86), and hysterectomy (n=238); elderly medical patients (n=96); and patients with chronic obstructive airways disease (n=32).

interventionsHospital at home care or inpatient hospital care.

main outcome measuresDartmouth COOP chart to measure patients' general health status; SF-36 to measure possible limitations in physical functioning of patients with hysterectomy; disease specific measures-chronic respiratory disease questionnaire, Barthel index for elderly medical patients, Oxford hip score, and Bristol knee score; hospital readmission and mortality data; carer strain index to measure burden on carers; patients' and carers' preferred form of care.

resultsAt follow up, there were no major differences in outcome between hospital at home care and hospital care for any of the patient groups except that those recovering from hip replacement reported a significantly greater improvement in quality of life with hospital at home care (difference in change from baseline value 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.88). Hospital at home did not seem suitable for patients recovering from a knee replacement, as 14 (30%) of patients allocated to hospital at home remained in hospital. Patients in all groups preferred hospital at home care except those with chronic obstructive airways disease. No differences were detected for carer burden. Carers of patients recovering from knee replacement preferred hospital at home care, while carers of patients recovering from a hysterectomy preferred hospital care.

conclusionsFew differences in outcome were detected. Thus, the cost of hospital at home compared with hospital care becomes a primary concern.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdultAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeEnglandFemaleHealth StatusHome Care Services, Hospital-BasedHospitals, DistrictHumansHysterectomyLung Diseases, ObstructiveMaleMiddle AgedPatient Readmission

Identifiers

PMID9624068
PMCPMC28578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.