Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9620365›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1998

Immunodiagnosis of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis by using culture-derived human isolates.

M D Ravyn, J L Goodman, C B Kodner, D K Westad, L A Coleman, S M Engstrom, C M Nelson, R C Johnson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Agents of human anaplasmosis and Lyme disease at Camp Ripley, Minnesota.Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2011
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Serological evidence for human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Western Austria.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2003
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M D RavynDepartment of Microbiology, University of Minnesota Academic Health Center, Minneapolis 55455-0312, USA. ravyn@lenti.med.umn.edu
J L Goodman
C B Kodner
D K Westad
L A Coleman
S M Engstrom
C M Nelson
R C Johnson
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

PATHOGENESIS OF HUMAN GRANULOCYTIC EHRLICHIOSISR01AI040952 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MUNDERLOH, ULRIKE GERTRUD · 1997 to 2001
$925k
LYME DISEASE: STUDY OF THE ETIOLOGICAL AGENTR01AR034744 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI JOHNSON, RUSSELL C · 1986 to 1999
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI40952-01NIAMS NIH HHS AR34744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is an emerging infection caused by an Ehrlichia species closely related to Ehrlichia equi and Ehrlichia phagocytophila. Recent advances in the isolation and cultivation of this organism have allowed us to develop an immunofluorescence assay (IFA), enzyme immunoassay (EIA), and Western immunoblotting (WB) using HL-60 cell culture-derived human isolates. Antibody was detected in sera from culture-confirmed HGE patients by IFA and EIA, and these samples were reactive when analyzed by immunoblot analysis. HGE patient sera had high antibody titers and did not react with uninfected HL-60 cells. When IFA, EIA, and WB were used to analyze sera from healthy donors or those with a range of other disorders, including infections caused by Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Rickettsia rickettsii, and Coxiella burnetti, no significant cross-reactivity could be detected by EIA or immunoblot analysis with the exception of two of four serum samples from R. rickettsii-infected patients that were reactive by IFA only. Sera from HGE patients did not significantly cross-react in serologic tests for Borrelia burgdorferi. Using sera from patients previously enrolled in two clinical trials of treatment for early Lyme disease, we evaluated a two-step approach for estimation of the seroprevalence of antibodies reactive with the etiologic agent of HGE. On the basis of the immunoblot assay results for sera from culture-confirmed HGE patients, WB was used to confirm the specificity of the antibody detected by EIA and IFA. EIA was found to be superior to IFA in the ability to detect WB-confirmed antibodies to the HGE agent. When EIA and WB were used, 56 (19.9%) patients with early Lyme disease (n = 281) had either specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) or IgG antibodies; 38 patients (13.5%) had IgM only, 6 (2.1%) had IgG only, and 12 (4.3%) had both IgM and IgG. Therefore, Lyme disease patients are at high potential risk for exposure to Ehrlichia. Analysis by immunoblotting of serial samples from persons with culture-confirmed HGE or patients with Lyme disease and antibodies to the agent of HGE revealed a reproducible pattern of the immune response to specific antigens. These samples confirmed the importance of the 42- to 45-kDa antigens as early, persistent, and specific markers of HGE infection. Other significant immunogenic proteins appear at 20, 21, 28, 30, and 60 kDa. Use of the two-test method of screening by EIA and confirming the specificity by WB appears to offer a sound approach to the clinical immunodiagnosis of HGE.

Indexed as

Blotting, WesternFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectImmunoenzyme TechniquesAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialCross ReactionsEhrlichiaEhrlichiosisGranulocytesHL-60 CellsHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MLyme DiseaseSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin M

Identifiers

PMID9620365
PMCPMC104863
OpenAlexW2114769172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.