Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9618670›Full record

ArticleHealth services research1998

Use of community versus individual socioeconomic data in predicting variation in hospital use.

T P Hofer, R A Wolfe, P J Tedeschi, L F McMahon, J R Griffith

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Enrichment of a Data Lake to Support Population Health Outcomes Studies Using Social Determinants Linked EHR Data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  5. Mediating Effects of Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Deprivation on the Association Between Race/Ethnicity and Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Length of stay and hospital costs among patients admitted to hospital by family physicians.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Causes of death and relative survival of older women after a breast cancer diagnosis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

T P HoferVA Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Ann Arbor VA HSR & D Field Program, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, USA. thofer@umich.edu.
R A Wolfe
P J Tedeschi
L F McMahon
J R Griffith

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives(1) To examine the association of socioeconomic characteristics (SES) with hospitalization by age group, and when using measures of SES at the community as opposed to the individual level. (2) Thus, to support the inference that socioeconomic factors are important in the analysis of small area utilization data and address potential criticisms of this conclusion. DATA SOURCES: The 1989 Michigan Inpatient Database (MIDB), the 1990 U.S. Census, the 1989 Area Resource File (ARF), and the 1990 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). STUDY

designA qualitative comparison of socioeconomic predictors of hospitalization in two cross-sectional analyses when using community as opposed to individual socioeconomic characteristics was done. DATA EXTRACTION. Hospitalizations (excluding delivery) were extracted by county from the MIDB and by individual from the NHIS. SES variables were extracted from the U.S. Census for communities and from the NHIS for individuals. Measures of employment for communities were from the ARF and information on health insurance and health status of individuals from the NHIS. PRINCIPAL

findingsBoth analyses show similar age-specific patterns for income and education. The effects were greatest in young adults, and diminished with increasing age. Accounting for multiple admissions did not change these conclusions. In the individual-level data the addition of variables representing health and insurance status substantially diminished the size of the coefficients for the socioeconomic variables.

conclusionsBy comparison to parallel individual-level analyses, small area analyses with community-level SES characteristics appear to represent the effect of individual-level characteristics. They are also not substantially affected by the inability to track individuals with multiple readmissions across hospitals. We conclude that the impact of SES characteristics on hospitalization rates is consistent when measured by individual or community-level measures and varies substantially by age. These variables should be included in analyses of small area variation.

Indexed as

Small-Area AnalysisSocioeconomic FactorsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionHealth Services MisuseHospitalizationHumansInfantMichiganMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID9618670
PMCPMC1070263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.