Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9618624›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of public health1998

Laying down the law: reducing illegal tobacco sales to minors in central Harlem.

D H Gemson, H L Moats, B X Watkins, M L Ganz, S Robinson, E Healton

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of public health, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Walking the Divide: A Public Health Journey from Manhattan to Harlem.Journal of social mathematical & human engineering sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Socioeconomic Disparities in Health Behaviors.Annual review of sociology · 2010
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. African Americans' attitudes toward cigarette excise taxes.American journal of public health · 2003
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Extramural prevention research at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974) · 2001
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. What are the effects of tobacco policies on vulnerable populations? A better practices review.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D H GemsonDivision of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University School of Public Health, New York, NY 10032, USA.
H L Moats
B X Watkins
M L Ganz
S Robinson
E Healton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study compared the impact of educational and enforcement interventions on retailers' sale of tobacco to minors in Central Harlem, New York.

methodsIn a randomized trial with repeated measures, 152 stores were randomly divided into control, education, and enforcement groups.

resultsOverall tobacco sales to 12- and 13-year-old minors at baseline (98%) were among the highest in the nation. At 6-month and 1-year follow-ups, decreases in rates of tobacco sales to minors were modest among education stores and substantial among enforcement stores.

conclusionsEffective reduction of tobacco sales to minors may require ongoing enforcement measures, including fines for retailers who violate state and local laws.

Indexed as

Urban PopulationAdolescentChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth EducationHumansMaleNew York CitySmokingSmoking Prevention

Identifiers

PMID9618624
PMCPMC1508216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.