Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9618484›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1998

Quantitative modeling of stochastic systems in molecular biology by using stochastic Petri nets.

P J Goss, J Peccoud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Behavior Prediction in Signaling Networks: Modeling of p16-Mediated Pathway.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Influence of Copper Dose onACS ES&T water · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Kinetic Modeling ofMetabolites · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Nets-within-nets for modeling emergent patterns in ontogenetic processes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P J GossDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Museum of Comparative Zoology Laboratories, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. goss@mcz.harvard.edu
J Peccoud

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An integrated understanding of molecular and developmental biology must consider the large number of molecular species involved and the low concentrations of many species in vivo. Quantitative stochastic models of molecular interaction networks can be expressed as stochastic Petri nets (SPNs), a mathematical formalism developed in computer science. Existing software can be used to define molecular interaction networks as SPNs and solve such models for the probability distributions of molecular species. This approach allows biologists to focus on the content of models and their interpretation, rather than their implementation. The standardized format of SPNs also facilitates the replication, extension, and transfer of models between researchers. A simple chemical system is presented to demonstrate the link between stochastic models of molecular interactions and SPNs. The approach is illustrated with examples of models of genetic and biochemical phenomena where the ULTRASAN package is used to present results from numerical analysis and the outcome of simulations.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, MolecularMolecular BiologyStochastic ProcessesAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID9618484
PMCPMC22622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.