Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9614787›Full record

ReviewThe Western journal of medicine1998

Strategies and methods for aligning current and best medical practices. The role of information technologies.

E C Schneider, J M Eisenberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Western journal of medicine, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Using a decade of data on medical student computer literacy for strategic planning.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2002
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E C SchneiderInstitute for Health Care Research and Policy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
J M Eisenberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid change in American medicine requires that physicians adjust established behaviors and acquire new skills. In this article, we address three questions: What do we know about how to change physicians' practices? How can physicians take advantage of new and evolving information technologies that are likely to have an impact on the future practice of medicine? and What strategic educational interventions will best enable physicians to show competencies in information management and readiness to change practice? We outline four guiding principles for incorporating information systems tools into both medical education and practice, and we make eight recommendations for the development of a new medical school curriculum. This curriculum will produce a future medical practitioner who is capable of using information technologies to systematically measure practice performance, appropriateness, and effectiveness while updating knowledge efficiently.

Indexed as

Computer LiteracyMedical InformaticsCurriculumDecision Making, Computer-AssistedDelivery of Health CareDistrict of ColumbiaEducation, MedicalEducation, Medical, ContinuingEvidence-Based MedicineForecastingHealth Care ReformHumansMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Management, MedicalPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID9614787
PMCPMC1304973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.