Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9613357›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood1998

Prolonged mechanical ventilation as a consequence of acute illness.

J Fraser, T Henrichsen, Q Mok, R C Tasker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of the Treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Tracheostomy-Dependent Pediatric Patients.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J FraserPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London.
T Henrichsen
Q Mok
R C Tasker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine why acutely ill children become dependent upon mechanical ventilation and what happens to them.

methodsA retrospective medical record study of all patients aged between 1 month and 16 years from 1983 to 1996 who required ventilation for more than 28 days.

resultsForty children were ventilated for between 36 and 180 days before discharge or death. Before their presenting illness, 13 (33%) were normal, 15 (37%) had documented predisposing conditions such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and the remaining 12 (30%) had diagnoses made after admission. The cause of respiratory failure was central in four patients (10%), spinal cord in eight (20%), neuromuscular in 11 (28%), and pulmonary in 17 (42%). Severe nosocomial infection requiring treatment with intravenous antibiotics occurred in 22. To date, 16 children (40%) have died, and 10 (25%) remain ventilator dependent. Of the 24 survivors, seven (29%) have severe residual neurological deficit.

conclusionsIncreasingly, children are surviving intensive care only to remain ventilator dependent and at risk of significant comorbidity. This study should inform further debate on why such children remain ventilator dependent, and how and where they are managed.

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationAcute DiseaseChildChild, PreschoolCritical CareCross InfectionFemaleHumansInfantLength of StayMaleRespiratory InsufficiencyRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVentilator Weaning

Identifiers

PMID9613357
PMCPMC1717488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.