ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics1998
Preimplantation diagnosis by FISH: the Rambam experience.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preimplantation genetics.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 1998Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOur purpose was to summarize our experience gained using fluorescence in situ hybridization for preimplantation diagnosis at the Rambam Medical Center.
methodsSeventy-three embryos (29 cycles) were analyzed for preimplantation diagnosis for the following indications: advanced maternal age (> 39 years), X-linked diseases, poor-quality embryos, repeated failure in vitro fertilization cycles and fast-dividing embryos. An additional 38 embryos with unequal pronuclei size were examined for ploidy. Biopsy of embryonic blastomeres was performed at the six- to eight-cell stage. Five fluorescence probes, for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18, and 21, were applied for ploidy detection.
resultsEighty-four (87%) blastomeres of the 73 embryos analyzed showed clear signals. Six of the blastomeres were lost during spreading. Two of the embryos were destroyed following biopsy. No nucleus was found in five of the blastomeres, while in nine, more than one nucleus was verified. Transfer was performed in 10 patients (32 embryos). Two pregnancies were achieved. Two healthy babies were born. Fifty-seven percent of the fast-dividing embryos demonstrated normal signals. In two groups of embryos of unequal pronuclei size following conventional insemination and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, 50 and 11.4% demonstrated normal signals.
conclusionsThe efficiency of fluorescence in situ hybridization for aneuploidy detection is 87 and 97% for autosomes and gonosomes, respectively. The preimplantation genetic diagnosis is suitable for selected in vitro fertilization cases including fast-dividing embryos and embryos with unequal pronuclei size following regular in vitro fertilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.