Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9599703›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives1998

Nephrotoxicity testing in vitro--what we know and what we need to know.

W Pfaller, G Gstraunthaler

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Pathophysiological mechanisms underlying a rat model of triple whammy acute kidney injury.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effect of ethanolic extract ofIntegrative medicine research · 2017
    Review
  20. Organ Distribution ofNeurochemical research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W PfallerInstitute of Physiology, University of Innsbruck, Austria. walter.pfaller@uibk.ac.at
G Gstraunthaler
Universität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The kidney is affected by many chemicals. Some of the chemicals may even contribute to end-stage renal disease and thus contribute considerably to health care costs. Because of the large functional reserve of the kidney, which masks signs of dysfunction, early diagnosis of renal disease is often difficult. Although numerous studies aimed at understanding the mechanisms underlying chemicals and drugs that target various renal cell types have delivered enough understanding for a reasonable risk assessment, there is still an urgent need to better understand the mechanisms leading to renal cell injury and organ dysfunction. The increasing use of in vitro techniques using isolated renal cells, nephron fragments, or cell cultures derived from specific renal cell types has improved our insight into the molecular mechanisms involved in nephrotoxicity. A short overview is given on the various in vitro systems currently used to clarify mechanistic aspects leading to sublethal or lethal injury of the functionally most important nephron epithelial cells derived from various species. Whereas freshly isolated cells and nephron fragments appear to represent a sufficient basis to study acute effects (hours) of nephrotoxins, e.g., on cell metabolism, primary cultures of these cells are more appropriate to study long-term effects. In contrast to isolated cells and fragments, however, primary cultures tend to first lose several of their in vivo metabolic properties during culture, and second to have only a limited life span (days to weeks). Moreover, establishing such primary cultures is a time-consuming and laborious procedure. For that reason many studies have been carried out on renal cell lines, which are easy to cultivate in large quantities and which have an unlimited life span. Unfortunately, none of the lines display a state of differentiation comparable to that of freshly isolated cells or their primary cultures. Most often they lack expression of key functions (e.g., gluconeogenesis or organic anion transport) of their in vivo correspondents. Therefore, the use of cell lines for assessment of nephrotoxic mechanisms will be limited to those functions the lines express. Upcoming molecular biology approaches such as the transduction of immortalizing genes into primary cultures and the utilization of cells from transgenic animals may in the near future result in the availability of highly differentiated renal cells with markedly extended life spans and near in vivo characteristics that may facilitate the use of renal cell culture for routine screening of nephrotoxins.

Indexed as

Cell LineHumansIn Vitro TechniquesKidneyKidney DiseasesPredictive Value of TestsToxicity TestsXenobioticsXenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID9599703
PMCPMC1533421
OpenAlexW2892326546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.