Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9597964›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne1998

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Newfoundland and Labrador.

G A Fox, J O'Dea, P S Parfrey

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Benchmarking the vital risk of waiting for coronary artery bypass surgery in Ontario.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2000
    Article
  5. Waiting lists for health care: a necessary evil?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 1999
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

G A FoxPatient Research Center, General Hospital, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Nfld.
J O'Dea
P S Parfrey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNewfoundland and Labrador, like other health care jurisdictions, is faced with widening gaps between the demands for health care and a strained ability to supply the necessary resources. The authors carried out a study to determine the rates of appropriate and inappropriate coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the province and the waiting times for this surgery.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study was performed in the tertiary care hospital that receives all referrals for coronary angiography and coronary artery revascularization for Newfoundland and Labrador. By reviewing the hospital records, the authors identified 2 groups of patients: those in whom critical coronary artery disease was diagnosed on the basis of coronary angiography and who were referred for CABG between Apr. 1, 1994, and Mar. 31, 1995, and those who actually underwent the procedure during that period. By applying specific criteria developed by the RAND Corporation, the authors determined the appropriateness and necessity of CABG in each case. They also compared waiting times for CABG with optimal waiting times; as determined by a consensus-based priority score.

resultsA total of 338 patients underwent CABG during the study period. The cases were characterized by multivessel disease and late-stage angina symptoms. Almost all of the patients had high appropriateness scores (7-9), and nearly 95% had high necessity scores (7-9). However, during the study period, the waiting list increased by about 20%, because a total of 391 patients were referred by the weekly cardiovascular surgery conference; the authors identified these and an additional 31 patients as having necessity scores of 7 or more. Only 7 (23%) of 31 patients for whom CABG was considered very urgent underwent surgery within the recommended 24 hours, and only 30 (24%) of the 122 patients for whom CABG was considered urgent underwent surgery within the recommended 72 hours.

interpretationThese results provide evidence that the cardiac surgery program in Newfoundland and Labrador is performing CABG in patients for whom surgical revascularization is highly appropriate and necessary. Access to CABG is less than ideal, however, since the waiting list continues to expand, and many patients wait beyond the recommended time for surgery.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassCohort StudiesCoronary AngiographyCoronary DiseaseDecision MakingDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNewfoundland and LabradorPatient SelectionReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRural PopulationTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID9597964
PMCPMC1229270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.