Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9596727›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity1998

Antigen-induced protective and nonprotective cell-mediated immune components against Cryptococcus neoformans.

J W Murphy, F Schafer, A Casadevall, A Adesina

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ReportedFEMS microbes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Protective immunity against cryptococcus neoformans infection.McGill journal of medicine : MJM : an international forum for the advancement of medical sciences by students · 2007
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J W MurphyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73190, USA. juneann-murphy@uokhsc.edu
F Schafer
A Casadevall
A Adesina
Bipar · FRAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

T-CELLS AND IMMUNITY TO CRYPTOCOCCOSISR01AI015716 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA NORMAN · PI MURPHY, JUNEANN W · 1985 to 2003
$1.0M
NATURAL CELL-MEDIATED RESISTANCE IN CRYPTOCOCCOSISR01AI018895 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA NORMAN · PI MURPHY, JUNEANN W · 1985 to 1990
–
NATURAL CELL-MEDIATED RESISTANCE IN CRYPTOCOCCOSISR37AI018895 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI MURPHY, JUNEANN W · 1991 to 1998
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI-15716NIAID NIH HHS AI-18895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice immunized with two different cryptococcal antigen preparations, one a soluble culture filtrate antigen (CneF) in complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) and the other heat-killed Cryptococcus neoformans cells (HKC), develop two different profiles of activated T cells. CneF-CFA induces CD4+ T cells responsible for delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactivity and for amplification of the anticryptococcal DTH response, whereas HKC induce CD4+ and CD8+ T cells involved in anticryptococcal DTH reactivity and activated T cells which directly kill C. neoformans cells. The main purpose of this study was to assess the level of protection afforded by each of the two different T-cell profiles against challenge with viable C. neoformans cells, thereby identifying which activated T-cell profile provides better protection. CBA/J mice immunized with CneF-CFA had significantly better protective responses, based on better clearance of C. neoformans from tissues, on longer survival times, and on fewer and smaller lesions in the brain, than HKC-immunized mice or control mice similarly infected with C. neoformans. Both immunization protocols induced an anticryptococcal DTH response, but neither induced serum antibodies to glucuronoxylmannan, so the protection observed in the CneF-CFA immunized mice was due to the activated T-cell profile induced by that protocol. HKC-immunized mice, which displayed no greater protection than controls, did not have the amplifier cells. Based on our findings, we propose that the protective anticryptococcal T cells are the CD4+ T cells which have been shown to be responsible for DTH reactivity and/or the CD4+ T cells which amplify the DTH response and which have been previously shown to produce high levels of gamma interferon and interleukin 2. Our results imply that there are protective and nonprotective cell-mediated immune responses and highlight the complexity of the immune response to C. neoformans antigens.

Indexed as

Immunity, CellularVaccinationAnimalsAntibodies, FungalAntigens, FungalBrainCryptococcosisFemaleLiverLungLymphocyte ActivationMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPolysaccharidesSpleenT-LymphocytesAntibodies, FungalAntigens, FungalPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID9596727
PMCPMC108249
OpenAlexW1940362182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.