ReviewHerz1998
[Therapeutic options for improvement of myocardial perfusion in coronary atherosclerosis].
Review in Herz, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combination of morphological atherosclerotic alterations of coronary vessels and disturbance of coronary vasomotor control of epicardial and resistance vessels determines the amount of myocardial oxygen supply. The endothelium plays a crucial role for functional alterations of the coronary vessels in patients with early atherosclerosis or risk factors for coronary artery disease. A therapy which aims to ameliorate endothelium-dependent vasodilator capacity improves myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease. Thereby, even in patients with angiographically normal or minimally diseased coronary vessels who develop myocardial ischemia due to microvascular disease, symptomatic improvement might be achieved. Control of coronary vasomotor tone and proliferation processes within the vessel wall are both determined by the redox equilibrium of nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide radicals (O2-), induced by angiotensin II. Thus, vasomotor control and vessel wall proliferation is closely related to each other. Aim of a therapeutic intervention to enhance NO bioactivity is either to increase NO production in the endothelium or to decrease O2- production, which rapidly inactivates NO. NO bioactivity can be ameliorated by ACE-inhibitors, increase of shear stress on the endothelium by physical exercise, estrogens or L-arginine. For these therapies clinically an improvement of endothelial vasodilator function could be shown. In addition, improvement of endothelial vasodilator function can be achieved by a treatment which reduced oxidative stress in the vascular wall such as antioxidants and, especially, lipid lowering drugs. Endothelin-antagonists and angiotensin II receptor-blockers are promising to improve endothelial dysfunction. However, these therapies have to be validated. Most therapy strategies, which have shown to ameliorate endothelial dysfunction, are also able to improve prognosis of the patients. Whether endothelial dysfunction alone--without evidence of overt coronary atherosclerosis--is sufficient to justify a long-term therapy to improve prognosis, still has to be clarified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9592707What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.