Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9577372›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology1998

Expression of proliferation associated antigens and detection of numerical chromosome aberrations in primary human liver tumours: relevance to tumour characteristics and prognosis.

M Nolte, M Werner, A Nasarek, H Bektas, R von Wasielewski, J Klempnauer, A Georgii

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Senescence markers in focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: pathogenic considerations on the basis of immunohistochemical results.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The prognostic molecular markers in hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2002
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M NolteInstitute of Pathology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
M Werner
A Nasarek
H Bektas
R von Wasielewski
J Klempnauer
A Georgii
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo assess cell proliferation and the presence of numerical chromosome aberrations involving chromosomes 1 and 8 in benign and malignant liver tumours.

methodsCell proliferation was studied immunohistochemically in paraffin wax embedded material from 62 primary liver tumours (20 hepatocellular carcinomas, 16 cholangiocellular carcinomas, 15 liver cell adenomas, 11 focal nodular hyperplasias), and the results were compared with histological characteristics and clinical data. Copy numbers of chromosomes 1 and 8 were assessed by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with satellite probes in fresh tumour material.

resultsThe expression of proliferation associated antigen Ki67, using the monoclonal antibody MIB-1, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), using the antibody PC10, was found to be significantly higher in malignant versus benign liver tumours. Neither Ki67 nor PCNA expression were independent prognostic parameters. However, there was a tendency for a worse outcome (survival < 12 months) for patients with a high MIB-1 labelling index (> 20%) compared with patients having the same tumour stage and a low MIB-1 index. Aneusomy for chromosomes 1 and 8 was demonstrated by FISH in malignant tumours (six of seven hepatocellular carcinomas, four of five cholangiocellular carcinomas) but not in benign tumours (none of nine) or non-neoplastic liver (none of nine).

conclusionBoth the determination of the proliferating cell fraction and FISH analysis are useful for distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma from liver cell adenoma or focal nodular hyperplasia; high fractions of proliferating cells are predictive of an early relapse.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsAntigens, NeoplasmCell DivisionChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8Diagnosis, DifferentialHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKi-67 AntigenLiver NeoplasmsPrognosisProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenSurvival RateAntigens, NeoplasmKi-67 AntigenProliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen

Identifiers

PMID9577372
PMCPMC500431
OpenAlexW2079938664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.