Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9577367›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology1998

Endometrial carcinoma: immunohistochemically detected proliferation index is a prognosticator of long-term outcome.

A M Gassel, J Backe, S Krebs, S Schön, H Caffier, H K Müller-Hermelink

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. International Society of Gynecological Pathologists (ISGyP) Endometrial Cancer Project: Guidelines From the Special Techniques and Ancillary Studies Group.International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Prognostic biomarkers in endometrial and ovarian carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2014
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A M GasselInstitute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Germany.
J Backe
S Krebs
S Schön
H Caffier
H K Müller-Hermelink
University of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo test which immunohistochemically detected tumour parameters are predictive of outcome in endometrial carcinoma.

methodsA retrospective study of 300 patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma between 1980 and 1985, ensuring a follow up of at least 10 years. Paraffin wax embedded tissues from 236 patients with endometrial carcinoma were evaluated in terms of histological tumour type and grade, stage of disease, and certain immunohistochemical biological parameters. These parameters included the expression of oestrogen and progesterone receptors, the expression of p53 protein, the expression of the c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, and the expression of protease cathepsin D, together with the rate of cell proliferation.

resultsUsing univariate analysis, the following parameters correlated significantly with adjusted survival: histological type (p = 0.025), grade (p = 0.00003), FIGO stage (p < 0.00001), proliferation rate (p = 0.00002), oestrogen receptor expression (p = 0.007), progesterone receptor expression (p = 0.0092), and p53 expression (p = 0.00028). These parameters also correlated significantly with both disease free and overall survival. There was a weak correlation of cathepsin D expression with survival, but no correlation of c-erb B-2 expression with survival. Using multivariate analysis, only FIGO stage (p = 0.0021), histological grade (p = 0.005), and proliferation rate (p = 0.0007) remained statistically significant prognosticators of adjusted survival as well as of disease free and overall survival.

conclusionsIn addition to conventional histological parameters, the immunohistochemical determination of proliferative activity could contribute to the identification of a high risk subgroup of endometrial carcinomas. The other parameters tested were not of significant additional predictive value.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceBiomarkers, TumorCathepsin DCell DivisionEndometrial NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCathepsin DErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesNeoplasm ProteinsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID9577367
PMCPMC500426
OpenAlexW1979905148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.