ArticleJournal of clinical pathology1998
Endometrial carcinoma: immunohistochemically detected proliferation index is a prognosticator of long-term outcome.
Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- International Society of Gynecological Pathologists (ISGyP) Endometrial Cancer Project: Guidelines From the Special Techniques and Ancillary Studies Group.International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists · 2019Article
- Minichromosome maintenance complex component 6 (MCM6) expression correlates with histological grade and survival in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2018Article
- Prognostic biomarkers in endometrial and ovarian carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2014Review
- APC promoter hypermethylation is an early event in endometrial tumorigenesis.Cancer science · 2010Article
- P53/MDM2 overexpression in metastatic endometrial cancer: correlation with clinicopathological features and patient outcome.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2007Article
- Body mass index as a prognostic factor in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.Journal of the National Medical Association · 2006Article
- Immunohistochemical analysis of MIB-1 proliferative activity in human endometrial cancer. Correlation with clinicopathological parameters, patient outcome, retinoblastoma immunoreactivity and K-ras codon 12 point mutations.The Histochemical journal · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo test which immunohistochemically detected tumour parameters are predictive of outcome in endometrial carcinoma.
methodsA retrospective study of 300 patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma between 1980 and 1985, ensuring a follow up of at least 10 years. Paraffin wax embedded tissues from 236 patients with endometrial carcinoma were evaluated in terms of histological tumour type and grade, stage of disease, and certain immunohistochemical biological parameters. These parameters included the expression of oestrogen and progesterone receptors, the expression of p53 protein, the expression of the c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, and the expression of protease cathepsin D, together with the rate of cell proliferation.
resultsUsing univariate analysis, the following parameters correlated significantly with adjusted survival: histological type (p = 0.025), grade (p = 0.00003), FIGO stage (p < 0.00001), proliferation rate (p = 0.00002), oestrogen receptor expression (p = 0.007), progesterone receptor expression (p = 0.0092), and p53 expression (p = 0.00028). These parameters also correlated significantly with both disease free and overall survival. There was a weak correlation of cathepsin D expression with survival, but no correlation of c-erb B-2 expression with survival. Using multivariate analysis, only FIGO stage (p = 0.0021), histological grade (p = 0.005), and proliferation rate (p = 0.0007) remained statistically significant prognosticators of adjusted survival as well as of disease free and overall survival.
conclusionsIn addition to conventional histological parameters, the immunohistochemical determination of proliferative activity could contribute to the identification of a high risk subgroup of endometrial carcinomas. The other parameters tested were not of significant additional predictive value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.