Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9571395›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging1998

Raloxifene.

J A Balfour, K L Goa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Targeting Oestrogen Receptor Signalling in Breast Cancer Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: new concepts and concerns.Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity · 2007
    Review
  10. Treatment-related osteoporosis in men with prostate cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2006
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J A BalfourAdis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
K L Goa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Raloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator which mimics the effects of estrogens on bone and blood lipid levels without stimulatory effects on the breast or uterus. Raloxifene inhibits estrogen-dependent proliferation of human breast cancer cells in vitro and development of induced mammary tumours in rats in vivo. Raloxifene inhibits bone resorption induced by estrogen deficiency in murine and human studies and lowers serum cholesterol levels. In clinical studies in postmenopausal women, raloxifene 60 mg/day for 2 years significantly increased bone mineral density compared with placebo. In comparative clinical studies, raloxifene 60 mg/day had more modest effects than conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg/day on bone resorption and formation parameters and appeared to be less effective in increasing bone mineral density. In older postmenopausal women with existing bone fractures, raloxifene 60 or 120 mg/day for 1 year produced modest increases in bone mineral density. The most common treatment-related adverse events in raloxifene recipients were hot flushes and leg cramps. The risk of venous thromboembolic events is increased during raloxifene therapy. In contrast with conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg/day, raloxifene 200 or 600 mg/day for 8 weeks or 150 mg/day for 1 year did not produce endometrial proliferation.

Indexed as

Estrogen Replacement TherapyAnimalsEstrogen AntagonistsFemaleHumansOsteoporosisPiperidinesPostmenopauseRaloxifene HydrochlorideRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEstrogen AntagonistsPiperidinesRaloxifene Hydrochloride

Identifiers

PMID9571395
OpenAlexW3188617539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.