Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9568567›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy1998

Nucleation and capture of large cell surface-associated microtubule arrays that are not located near centrosomes in certain cochlear epithelial cells.

J B Tucker, M M Mogensen, C G Henderson, S J Doxsey, M Wright, T Stearns

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Centrosome function and assembly in animal cells.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

J B TuckerSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of St Andrews, Scotland, UK.
M M Mogensen
C G Henderson
S J Doxsey
M Wright
T Stearns
Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale · FRStanford University · USUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

Mitotic functions of cilia proteinsR01GM051994 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI DOXSEY, STEPHEN J · 1995 to 2014
$4.3M
Centrosome and mitotic functions of ciliary proteinsR56GM051994 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI DOXSEY, STEPHEN J · 2009 to 2009
$375k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM51994NIGMS NIH HHS GM52022Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report deals with the as yet undetermined issue of whether cell-surface associated microtubules in certain cochlear epithelial cells are centrosomally nucleated and subsequently migrate to microtubule-capturing sites located at the surface regions in question. Alternatively, the cells may possess additional nucleating sites which are noncentrosomal and surface-associated. These alternative possibilities have been investigated for highly polarised epithelial cells called supporting cells in the mouse and guinea pig organ of Corti using antibodies to pericentrin and gamma-tubulin. There is substantial evidence that both proteins are essential components of microtubule-nucleating sites in cells generally. Each mature supporting cell possesses a large microtubule array that is remotely located with respect to its centrosome (more than 10 microns away). The antibodies bind to a cell's centrosome. No binding has been detected at 2 other microtubule-organising centres that are associated with the ends of the centrosomally-remote microtubule array while it is being constructed. Such arrays include thousands of microtubules in some of the cell types that have been examined. If all a cell's microtubules are nucleated by its centrosome then the findings reported above imply that microtubules escape from the centrosomal nucleating site and migrate to a new location. Furthermore capture of the plus and minus ends of the errant microtubules is taking place because both ends of a centrosomally-remote microtubule array are attached to sites that are precisely positioned at certain cell surface locations. Minus ends are locating targets with an exactitude comparable to that which has been demonstrated for plus ends in certain cell types. These cells apparently operate a single control centre strategy for microtubule nucleation that is complemented by precise positioning of plus and minus end-capturing sites at the cell surface.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigensCentrosomeGuinea PigsImmunohistochemistryLabyrinth Supporting CellsMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicrotubule ProteinsMicrotubulesTubulinAntigensMicrotubule ProteinspericentrinTubulin

Identifiers

PMID9568567
PMCPMC1467745
OpenAlexW2107759509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.