Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9566802›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology1998

Anti-ribosomal antibodies bind the Sm proteins D and B/B'.

L Caponi, S Bombardieri, P Migliorini

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Anti-ribosomal antibodies from lupus patients bind DNA.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2002
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L CaponiClinical Immunology Unit, Istituto di Patologia Medica, University of Pisa, Italy.
S Bombardieri
P Migliorini
University of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to analyse the specificity of human anti-ribosomal P protein antibodies, anti-ribosomal P protein antibodies were affinity-purified from the sera of lupus patients. Their binding capacity towards recombinant SmD protein and recombinant SmB/B' protein was evaluated by immunoblot and ELISA. Epitope mapping of SmD was performed by means of synthetic peptides. Anti-ribosomal P protein antibodies bound recombinant SmD (5/10) and SmB/B' (4/10) on immunoblot; 6/10 showed binding capacity to SmD on ELISA. Inhibition experiments using ELISA confirmed the specificity of this binding. Our data indicate the cross-reactivity of spontaneously developed anti-ribosomal P protein antibodies with the B/B' and D constituents of the Sm complex. The coexistence of anti-Sm and anti-ribosomal antibodies in lupus sera may therefore be due, at least in part, to the reactivity of a single autoantibody population.

Indexed as

Antibody SpecificityProtozoan ProteinsAutoantibodiesAutoantigensCross ReactionsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicReceptors, FcRecombinant ProteinsRibonucleoproteins, Small NuclearRibosomal ProteinsRibosomessnRNP Core ProteinsAutoantibodiesAutoantigensIgA receptorL12E protein, Trypanosoma cruziProtozoan ProteinsReceptors, FcRecombinant ProteinsRibonucleoproteins, Small NuclearRibosomal ProteinssnRNP Core ProteinsSNRPB protein, human

Identifiers

PMID9566802
PMCPMC1904945
OpenAlexW2039195120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.