Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9565385›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine1998

Intervention to increase mammography utilization in a public hospital.

T C Davis, H J Berkel, C L Arnold, I Nandy, R H Jackson, P W Murphy

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Health literacy and cancer screening: a systematic review.Patient education and counseling · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Improving mammography screening among the medically underserved.Journal of general internal medicine · 2014
    Trial
  7. Results of a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a culturally targeted and a generic video on mammography screening among chinese-american immigrants.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2012
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Peripartum racial/ethnic disparities.International anesthesiology clinics · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Joint breast and colorectal cancer screenings in medically underserved women.The Journal of community and supportive oncology · 2015
    Article
  14. The future of the cancer prevention workforce: why health literacy, advocacy, and stakeholder collaborations matter.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2010
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Interventions to Improve Care for Patients with Limited Health Literacy.Journal of clinical outcomes management : JCOM · 2009
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T C DavisDepartment of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Medical Center School of Medicine in Shreveport, 71130-3932, USA.
H J Berkel
C L Arnold
I Nandy
R H Jackson
P W Murphy

Funding

IMPROVING SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY USER03CA059235 · NCI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI DAVIS, TERRY C · 1994 to 1994
–
NCI NIH HHS 1R03-CA59235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study the effects of three approaches to increasing utilization of screening mammography in a public hospital setting in Northwest Louisiana.

designRandomized intervention study. POPULATION: Four hundred forty-five women aged 40 years and over, predominantly low-income and with low literacy skills, who had not had a mammogram in the preceding year.

interventionAll interventions were chosen to motivate women to get a mammogram. Group 1 received a personal recommendation from one of the investigators. Group 2 received the recommendation plus an easy-to-read National Cancer Institute (NCI) brochure. Group 3 received the recommendation, the brochure, and a 12-minute interactive educational and motivational program, including a soap-opera-style video, developed in collaboration with women from the target population. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsMammography utilization was determined at 6 months and 2 years after intervention. A significant increase (p = .05) in mammography utilization was observed after the intervention designed in collaboration with patients (29%) as compared with recommendation alone (21%) or recommendation with brochure (18%) at 6 months. However, at 2 years the difference favoring the custom-made intervention was no longer significant.

conclusionsAt 6 months there was at least a 30% increase in the mammography utilization rate in the group receiving the intervention designed in collaboration with patients as compared with those receiving the recommendation alone or recommendation with brochure. Giving patients an easy-to-read NCI brochure and a personal recommendation was no more effective than giving them a recommendation alone, suggesting that simply providing women in a public hospital with a low-literacy-level, culturally appropriate brochure is not sufficient to increase screening mammography rates. In a multivariate analysis, the only significant predictor of mammography use at 6 months was the custom-made intervention.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHospitals, PublicHumansLouisianaMammographyMiddle AgedPatient Education as Topic

Identifiers

PMID9565385
PMCPMC1496943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.