ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics1997
Similarity or discrepancy in pharmacokinetic parameter estimation between bolus and infusion studies.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The rate and extent of oral bioavailability versus the rate and extent of oral absorption: clarification and recommendation of terminology.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A recent study by Heatherington and Rowland showing discrepancies in steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) estimation of two barbiturates between bolus and infusion studies in rat hindlimb preparations was reviewed. Their rationale is that increasing the duration of administration may increase the accessibility for tissue distribution and thus increase Vss for compounds showing slow tissue uptake. Such a dosing-duration-dependent distribution concept is, however, inconsistent with the principle in linear kinetics that the fate or disposition function of any drug molecules is independent of time of administration and presence of other molecules. When their well-designed bolus studies were reanalyzed by including extrapolated outflow data from the last sampling time to infinity, the Vss values for the two barbiturates were found to be very similar to those obtained by the infusion method. Our analysis seems to validate a theoretical concept that parameter estimation is independent of the duration of administration in linear kinetics. A potential complication of using the bolus method to study Vss is presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.